{"id":10118,"date":"2026-10-05T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-10-05T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/godshand.link\/ground_post\/impacts-of-wfps-resilience-programming-evidence-from-a-four-country-study\/"},"modified":"2026-10-05T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2026-10-05T12:00:00","slug":"impacts-of-wfps-resilience-programming-evidence-from-a-four-country-study","status":"publish","type":"ground_post","link":"https:\/\/godshand.link\/en_gb\/ground_post\/impacts-of-wfps-resilience-programming-evidence-from-a-four-country-study\/","title":{"rendered":"Impacts of WFP\u2019s Resilience programming: Evidence from a four-country study"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n \"https:\/\/docs.wfp.org\/api\/documents\/WFP-0000176278\/download\/\"
\n <\/figure>\n
\n <\/p>\n
\n As climate shocks intensify and aid budgets shrink, development and humanitarian agencies need clear evidence to show what works to build resilience and reduce poverty.\n <\/div>\n
\n

From 2021 to 2023, impact evaluations in Niger<\/a>, Mali<\/a>, Rwanda<\/a> and South Sudan<\/a> used randomized controlled trials to compare communities who had access to Food Assistance for Assets and integrated resilience interventions against communities who did not participate in these programmes.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The evaluations documented food security, livelihood strategies and other outcomes such as mental health, consumption or time use. Evidence shows that:<\/p>\n